1955 MacArthur Airport United Airlines crash

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
1955 MacArthur Airport United Airlines crash
A photograph of an aircraft with four propellers in the air
A United Airlines Douglas DC-6, similar to Mainliner Idaho, the aircraft involved in the accident
Accident summary
Date April 4, 19551
Summary Pilot error2
Site Long Island MacArthur Airport, Ronkonkoma, Islip, New York, United States2
(40°47′43″N 073°06′01″W / 40.79528°N 73.10028°W / 40.79528; -73.10028Coordinates: 40°47′43″N 073°06′01″W / 40.79528°N 73.10028°W / 40.79528; -73.10028)
Crew 33
Injuries (non-fatal) 0
Fatalities 3 (all)3
Survivors 0
Aircraft type Douglas DC-62
Aircraft name Mainliner Idaho4
Operator United Airlines
Registration N375121
Flight origin Long Island MacArthur Airport, Ronkonkoma, Islip, New York, United States2
Destination LaGuardia Airport, New York City, New York, United States2

On April 4, 1955, a United Airlines Douglas DC-6 named Mainliner Idaho crashed shortly after taking off from Long Island MacArthur Airport, in Ronkonkoma, Islip, New York, United States. The aircraft, registration number N37512, was performing an instrument rating check flight, when, shortly after taking off, it began banking to the right. Seconds after climbing through 150 feet (46 m), the aircraft turned through 90 degrees, causing the nose to drop suddenly, before it impacted with the ground.

A subsequent investigation found that the flight crew were simulating an engine failure, which involved a member of the crew pulling back the throttle lever for engine No. 4 prior to taking off. Investigators found that if the throttle lever was pulled back too far, however, it would cause the propeller to reverse—a feature designed to slow the aircraft upon landing. Once the landing gear was raised, the crew would have to raise a metal flag in the cockpit to bring the propeller blades back into the correct position, since a safety device prevented electric power from operating the rotating mechanism at the roots of the blades unless the aircraft was on the ground or the flag was manually raised. Investigators from the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) concluded that one of the flight crew applied full power to No. 4 engine, thinking this would bring the aircraft out of the increasing bank. But because the blades were reversed and the flag was not raised, the dramatically increased reverse thrust caused the DC-6 to spiral out of control. The investigators also concluded that the suddenness of the bank and dive meant the flight crew had little chance to recover the aircraft before impact.

In the aftermath of the accident, the Civil Aeronautics Administration (CAA) issued an Airworthiness Directive ordering all DC-6 and DC-6B aircraft be fitted with a manual device which could prevent the inadvertent reversal of the propeller blades. United Airlines also stated they had begun installing reverse thrust indicator lights in the cockpits of their DC-6 aircraft, which would warn pilots when a propeller had reversed.

History

On April 4, 1955, a United Airlines check captain, Stanley C. Hoyt, age 45, was carrying out instrument rating checks on two of the airline's pilots. Hoyt had been employed by United Airlines in 1937, and had 9,763 flying hours experience, 549 of which were in a DC-6.5 He was training the two pilots, Henry M. Dozier, age 40, and Vernis H. Webb, age 35,5 so they would be able to retain an instrument rating qualification, allowing them to fly under instrument flight rules.4 The aircraft was a Douglas DC-6, registration N37512, serial number 43001. The airframe had flown 22,068 flying hours, and had undergone an inspection 105 hours before the accident. The aircraft was powered by four Pratt & Whitney R2800-CB16 engines, fitted with Hamilton Standard 43E60-317 propellers.5

The weather on the day of the accident was clear, although there was a strong wind of about 20 knots (37 km/h) hitting the airfield from the southwest, with occasional gusts of wind as fast as 30 knots (56 km/h).4 The aircraft made several circuits, taking off and landing again, before eyewitnesses observed the aircraft standing at the end of the runway and then taking off at about 15:50 Eastern Standard Time.43 Loaded with around 61,000 pounds (28,000 kg), the aircraft was far below its maximum permissible weight and the center of gravity was within the prescribed limits for the model of aircraft.45

Between 1,500 feet (460 m) and 1,800 feet (550 m) down the runway, the aircraft reached take-off speed, lifted off the ground, and began climbing normally as the crew retracted the landing gear. Upon climbing through 50 feet (15 m), however, the aircraft began banking right. The climbing bank continued to increase at a rate which alarmed witnesses, and soon after the aircraft rotated through 90° (at which point the wings were vertical to the ground).45 At a height of around 150 feet (46 m), with all four engines producing take-off thrust, the nose began to fall, and the aircraft stalled. The right wing and nose impacted with the ground, causing the fuselage to cartwheel over, before the aircraft came to rest the correct side up and was engulfed in flames. Though emergency services at Long Island MacArthur responded to the crash, all three members of the flight crew had been killed on impact. The aircraft was destroyed by the post-crash fire.45

Investigation

Wreckage examination

A Pratt & Whitney R-2800 engine, the type of engine installed on Douglas DC-6 aircraft6

The Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB), the organization charged with investigating the accident, went to Long Island MacArthur Airport to examine the wreckage. Upon hearing reports from witnesses of the crash that the aircraft appeared to have rotated and begun climbing normally before it began banking sharply to the right, investigators examined the four charred engines. While they had all been severely damaged by the impact and subsequent fire, it was concluded that all four were producing power at the point of impact.45 The CAB could not conclusively determine the amount of power being produced, but investigators stated there was no evidence found in the wreckage that suggested the engines might have suffered an operational failure.57

Investigators were also able to determine all of the flight control surfaces, including the elevators, ailerons and rudder, were functioning correctly at the point of the crash, and it was also found there were no faults in the flight control system of the aircraft. The flaps, it was found, were extended to between 15° and 20°, the standard setting for take-off. Investigators did discover, however, that the propeller blades of No. 4 engine—the engine on the far right side of the aircraft—were reversed. While the blades of Nos. 1, 2 and 3 engines were at 34° positive pitch (also standard for take-off), the blades of No. 4 engine were set at full reverse pitch—minus 8°.57

Reversed thrust

A video of a Douglas DC-6. From 00:04–00:10, the propeller blades rotate; this is the feature that led to the accident.

The propellers of a DC-6 are designed to provide reverse thrust when the aircraft touches down. When this feature is activated, the propellers begin producing thrust in the opposite direction, propelling the aircraft backwards to slow it down. When the crew then retards the throttle levers, electric mechanisms in the propeller hub rotate the blades to a position in which they will provide reverse thrust.7 Should a crew need to perform a go-around, they could restore the thrust levers to a positive position and again produce forward thrust, allowing them to execute the maneuver.7

The Douglas Aircraft Company, however, designed a system that would prevent the accidental reversal of propeller blades in-flight. During development of the DC-6, the company installed a system that cut electrical power to the mechanisms which rotated the blades while the airplane was in the air. When there was enough weight on the landing gear (which would only be the case when the aircraft was on the ground), a switch which supplied electrical power to the mechanisms was closed—meaning that when the aircraft touched down the blades could be reversed and thus the airplane could be slowed. When the switch was closed, a red flag would swing into view in the cockpit of the aircraft, warning the crew that the blades could be reversed. Should the switch fail to close upon landing, the flag could be raised manually and electrical power to the mechanisms would be restored. When the aircraft took off, electrical power would be cut to the mechanisms so that the propeller blades could not be inadvertently reversed, and the red flag swung out of sight. Reverse thrust warning lamps, which would have warned the crew if the propellers were reversed, were not fitted on Mainliner Idaho.7

Flight tests

The nose gear of a Douglas DC-6

The CAB carried out flight tests using a DC-6. They found that if the propellers were reversed prior to take-off they would not, if the flag was not raised, be rotated automatically again in the air to produce forward thrust if full power was applied. Tests performed by United Airlines showed that, if the propellers of just one engine were reversed and full power was applied to all four engines, then the aircraft would spiral into a dive. If METO (maximum except take-off) power was applied to Nos. 1, 2 and 3 engines, and full reverse thrust was applied to engine No. 4, then the aircraft would become uncontrollable.58

If full left aileron was applied, the aircraft could be recovered for a short period of time, but a violent turn to the right would continue, and the competing forces would cause the aircraft to stall, and violently roll and pitch down. Flight tests, investigators said, accurately reproduced what happened to Mainliner Idaho during the accident sequence. The tests performed by United and by the investigators showed that if, after the aircraft became airborne, full power was applied to an engine whose propellers were reversed, the propellers would produce not positive thrust, but increased reverse thrust.58 One aviation author wrote of the crash,

"The flight tests showed conclusively that, at take-off configuration, a DC-6 becomes uncontrollable with an outboard engine at full power with its propeller in reverse pitch. Control is lost so quickly that there is little the crew can do at low altitude. In the case of this accident, it was doubtful if there would have been time for forward thrust to be restored before control was lost."

Macarthur JobAir Disaster Vol. 4, 20018

Conclusions

While the wreckage was being examined, investigators found that all four engines were producing thrust at the time of impact. There were only two ways that the propeller could be reversed during the take-off sequence. Investigators ruled out electrical malfunction since, after detailed examination of the engine hub, there was no evidence found of this happening.59 Therefore, it was concluded that the only way the propeller could have been reversed was through an unintentional crew action. Although there was no formal evidence that a simulated engine failure was being performed, statements submitted by witnesses suggested that it was likely this was the case. United Airlines procedure calls for No. 4 engine to be shut down in a simulated engine failure—the same engine which was found at the crash site with its propellers reversed.59

A set of propeller blades, unattached from an aircraft mounting.
The propellers of a Douglas DC-6 engine, similar to those installed on the engines of Mainliner Idaho

The investigation concluded that the accident sequence began when the check pilot, while the aircraft was on the ground, retarded the throttle lever for No. 4 engine past the idle position, and therefore reversed the propellers of the aircraft. Once the airplane took off and started banking to the right, it would have been a natural reaction for one of the flight crew to increase power to No. 4 engine, thinking that by doing so the engine would start producing positive thrust and the aircraft could be recovered. However, since the metal flag was not raised, there was no electrical power to the rotating mechanisms—and increasing power to No. 4 engine would only have created more reverse thrust.59

The final accident report concluded that there was no time for the crew to react, since the dive began so suddenly, and there was no way for the crew to recover the aircraft. "Control will be lost so quickly that there is little, if anything, that the pilot can do if it occurs at low altitude," the report stated. "He must recognize what is occurring, analyze it, and take action to unreverse in a very limited amount of time. It is doubtful that unreversing could have been accomplished in this instance before control was lost."5 On October 4, 1955, the CAB released the final accident report, which concluded the reversal of the propellers and subsequent increase in power to No. 4 engine had caused the accident.5

"The Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was unintentional movement of No. 4 throttle into the reverse range just before breaking ground, with the other three engines operating at high power output, which resulted in the aircraft very quickly becoming uncontrollable once airborne."

Civil Aeronautics BoardAccident Investigation Report; United Air Lines, Inc., MacArthur Field, Islip, New York, 19555

Aftermath

Technological advances

Following the accident, the Civil Aeronautics Administration (CAA) issued an Airworthiness Directive ordering all DC-6 and DC-6B aircraft to be fitted with a sequence gate latch, known as a Martin bar. The device is a metal bar which a crew would manually swing in front of the thrust levers over the idle line, physically preventing the thrust levers from being retarded into the reverse position. According to the CAB report, a United Airlines engineer told investigators the Martin bar should make propeller reversal "a more reliable and safer device [than the system fitted to Mainliner Idaho ... with its numerous switches, relays, and automatic operation."5

United Airlines issued a statement saying it had begun installing the device on its fleet of DC-6 and DC-6B aircraft one week before the accident, having used it successfully in service on their fleet of Douglas DC-7 aircraft. A Martin bar had not yet been fitted on Mainliner Idaho.8 United Airlines also said a program had begun to install reverse thrust indicator lights on all their DC-6 and DC-6B aircraft. The signals, fitted in the cockpit of the aircraft, would have warned the flight crew that the thrust lever had been pulled back too far, and the propellers had been reversed.5

Similar accidents

A Lauda Air Boeing 767, similar to the aircraft which crashed in 1991 after one of the thrust reversers deployed in-flight.

Since the crash, there have been several other accidents involving reverse thrust. A Douglas DC-8 operating United Airlines Flight 859 crashed in 1961 when the first officer attempted to reverse all four engines during the landing roll. The left engines remained in forward thrust, while the right engines went into reverse, causing the aircraft to veer rapidly to the right and collide with airport construction vehicles, killing 18 of the 122 people aboard.10 Japan Airlines Flight 350, a DC-8, crashed in 1982 short of the runway in Tokyo, after the mentally ill captain attempted suicide during the final approach phase of the flight, by putting the inboard engines into reverse thrust. Of the 174 people aboard, 24 died.1112 1314 In 1991, Lauda Air Flight 004, operated by a Boeing 767, crashed after the left engine thrust reverser deployed in-flight for reasons that could not be determined.15 The crash of a TAM Airlines Fokker 100 in 1996 was attributed to the deployment of the thrust reverser on No. 2 engine. The aircraft rolled to the right and crashed in a populated area of São Paulo, Brazil.16

See also


References

Notes
  1. ^ a b "Archives 1955 Jan-Jun". Aircraft Crashes Record Office. Retrieved December 26, 2010. 
  2. ^ a b c d e "Accident description". Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved October 22, 2010. 
  3. ^ a b c "L. I. Crash Kills 3 Veteran Airline Pilots On Take-Off During Routine Check Hop". New York Times. April 5, 1955. Retrieved December 26, 2010.  (subscription required)
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h Job 2001, p. 45.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s "Accident Investigation Report; United Air Lines, Inc., MacArthur Field, Islip, New York". Civil Aeronautics Board. 1955. Retrieved January 12, 2011.  (subscription required)
  6. ^ "The Douglas DC-6". Airliners.net. Retrieved December 28, 2010. 
  7. ^ a b c d e Job 2001, p. 46.
  8. ^ a b c d Job 2001, p. 47.
  9. ^ a b c Job 2001, p. 49.
  10. ^ "Aircraft Accident Report: United Airlines Flight 859". 
  11. ^ Accident Database: Accident Synopsis 02091982
  12. ^ COCKPIT FIGHT REPORTED ON JET THAT CRASHED IN TOKYO," The New York Times. February 14, 1982. Retrieved on June 24, 2011.
  13. ^ "Troubled Pilot". Time. 1982-03-01. Retrieved 2007-04-20. 
  14. ^ Final Accident Report
  15. ^ "Lauda Air B767 Accident Report". Aircraft Accident Investigation Committee of Thailand. Retrieved January 23, 2011. 
  16. ^ "Accident description". Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved January 23, 2010. 
Bibliography







Creative Commons License