The Armero tragedy (Spanish: Tragedia de Armero [tɾaˈxeðja ðe arˈmeɾo]) was one of the major consequences of the eruption of the Nevado del Ruiz stratovolcano in Tolima, Colombia, on November 13, 1985. After 69 years of dormancy, the volcano's eruption caught nearby towns unaware, even though the government had received warnings from multiple volcanological organizations to evacuate the area when volcanic activity had been detected in September 1985.1
As pyroclastic flows erupted from the volcano's crater, they melted the mountain's glaciers, sending four enormous lahars (volcanically induced mudslides, landslides, and debris flows) down its slopes at 50 kilometers per hour (30 miles per hour). The lahars picked up speed in gullies and coursed into the six major rivers at the base of the volcano; they engulfed the town of Armero, killing more than 20,000 of its almost 29,000 inhabitants.2 Casualties in other towns, particularly Chinchiná, brought the overall death toll to 23,000. Footage and photographs of Omayra Sánchez, a young victim of the tragedy, were published around the world. Other photographs of the lahars and the impact of the disaster captured attention worldwide and led to controversy over the degree to which the Colombian government was responsible for the disaster. A banner at a mass funeral in Ibagué read, "The volcano didn't kill 22,000 people. The government killed them."
The relief efforts were hindered by the composition of the mud, which made it nearly impossible to move through without becoming stuck. By the time relief workers reached Armero twelve hours after the eruption, many of the victims with serious injuries were dead. The relief workers were horrified by the landscape of fallen trees, disfigured human bodies, and piles of debris from entire houses. This was the second-deadliest volcanic disaster of the 20th century, surpassed only by the 1902 eruption of Mount Pelée, and is the fourth-deadliest volcanic event recorded since 1500 AD. The event was a foreseeable catastrophe exacerbated by the populace's unawareness of the volcano's destructive history; geologists and other experts had warned authorities and media outlets about the danger over the weeks and days leading up to the eruption. Hazard maps for the vicinity were prepared, but poorly distributed. On the day of the eruption, several evacuation attempts were made, but a severe storm restricted communications. Many victims stayed in their houses as they had been instructed, believing that the eruption had ended. The noise from the storm may have prevented many from hearing the sounds from Ruiz until it was too late.
Nevado del Ruiz has erupted several times since the disaster, and continues to threaten up to 500,000 people living along the Combeima, Chinchina, Coello-Toche, and Guali river valleys. A lahar (or group of lahars) similar in size to the 1985 event could potentially travel as far as 100 kilometers (60 mi) from the volcano, and could be triggered by a small eruption. To counter this threat, the Colombian government established a specialized office which promotes awareness of natural threats. The United States Geological Survey also created the Volcano Disaster Assistance Program and the Volcano Crisis Assistance Team, which evacuated roughly 75,000 people from the area around Mount Pinatubo before its 1991 eruption. In 1988, three years after the eruption, Dr. Stanley Williams of Louisiana State University stated that, "With the possible exception of Mount St. Helens in the state of Washington, no other volcano in the Western Hemisphere is being watched so elaborately" as Nevado del Ruiz. Additionally, many of Colombia's cities have programs to raise awareness of natural disaster planning programs which have helped save lives in natural disasters. Near Nevado del Ruiz in particular, locals have become wary of volcanic activity: when the volcano erupted in 1989, more than 2,300 people living around it were evacuated.
Armero, located 48 kilometers (30 mi) from the Nevado del Ruiz volcano and 169 kilometers (105 mi) from Colombia's capital of Bogotá, was the third largest town in Tolima Department, after Ibagué and Espinal.3 A prominent farming town before the eruption, it was responsible for roughly one-fifth of Colombia's rice production, and for a large share of the cotton, sorghum, and coffee crops. Much of this success can be attributed to Nevado del Ruiz, as the fertile volcanic soil had stimulated agricultural growth.4 Built on top of an alluvial fan5 that had been host to historic lahars, the town was previously destroyed by a volcanic eruption in 1595 and by mudflows in 1845.6 In the 1595 eruption, three distinct Plinian eruptions7 produced lahars that claimed the lives of 636 people.8 During the 1845 event, 1,000 people were killed by earthquake-generated mudflows near the Magdalena River.9
Nevado del Ruiz has undergone three distinct eruptive periods, the first beginning 1.8 million years ago. During the present period (beginning 11,000 years ago), it has erupted at least twelve times, producing ashfalls, pyroclastic flows, and lahars. The historically recorded eruptions have primarily involved a central vent eruption (in the caldera) followed by an explosive eruption, then the formation of lahars. Ruiz's earliest identified Holocene eruption was in about 6660 BC, and further eruptions occurred around 1245, 850, 200 BC and in about 350, 675, in 1350, 1541 (perhaps), 1570, 1595, 1623, 1805, 1826, 1828 (perhaps), 1829, 1831, 1833 (perhaps), 1845, 1916, December 1984 through March 1985, 1987 through July 1991, and possibly in April 1994. Many of these eruptions involved a central vent eruption, a flank vent eruption, and a phreatic (steam) explosion.10 Ruiz is the second-most active volcano in Colombia after Galeras.11
One week before the eruption, the Palace of Justice siege took place. The assailants (M-19 a Marxist, Terrorist Insurgency group) planned to hold a trial involving Colombian President Belisario Betancur. He refused to participate and sent the national army into the building. The attackers were holding several hundred hostages, including the 24 Supreme Court justices and 20 other judges. In the ensuing battle between the two forces, more than 75 hostages died (including 11 judges). This disaster, coupled with the Armero tragedy, spurred the Colombian government to predict and prepare for a broad range of threats.12
In late 1984, geologists noticed that seismic activity in the area had begun to increase. Increased fumarole activity, deposition of sulfur on the summit of the volcano, and phreatic eruptions also alerted geologists to the possibility of an eruption. Phreatic events, when rising magma encounters water, continued well into September 1985 (one major event took place on September 11, 1985), shooting steam high into the air. Activity began to decline in October, probably because the new magma had finished ascending into Nevado del Ruiz's volcanic edifice.13
An Italian volcanological mission analyzed gas samples from fumaroles along the Arenas crater floor and found them to be a mixture of carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide, indicating a direct release of magma into the surface environment. Publishing a report for officials on October 22, 1985, the scientists determined that the risk of lahars was unusually high. To prepare for the eruption, the report gave several simple preparedness techniques to local authorities.14 Another team gave the local officials seismographs, but no instructions on how to operate them.15
Volcanic activity increased again in November 1985 as magma neared the surface. Increasing quantities of gases rich in sulfur dioxide and elemental sulfur began to appear in the volcano. The water content of the fumaroles' gases decreased, and water springs in the vicinity of Nevado del Ruiz became enriched with magnesium, calcium and potassium, leached from the magma.13 The thermodynamic equilibration temperatures, corresponding to the chemical composition of the discharged gases, ranged from 200 to 600 °C (400 to 1,100 °F); this is a measure of the temperature at which the gases equilibrated within the volcano. The extensive degassing of the magma caused pressure to build up inside the volcano in the space above the magma, which eventually resulted in the explosive eruption.16
In September 1985, as earthquakes and phreatic eruptions rocked the area, local officials began planning for an evacuation. In October, a hazard map was finalized for the area around Nevado del Ruiz.nb 1 This map highlighted the danger from falling material—including ash and rock—near Murillo, Santa Isabel, and Libano, as well as the threat of lahars in Mariquita, Guayabal, Chinchiná and Armero.18 Unfortunately, the map was poorly distributed to the people at high risk from Ruiz: many survivors had never heard of it, even though several of the country's major newspapers featured versions of the map.17 Henry Villegas of INGEOMINAS (Colombian Institute of Mining and Geology) stated that the hazard maps clearly demonstrated that Armero would be affected by the lahars, but that the map "met with strong opposition from economic interests." He added that because the map was not prepared long before the eruption, mass production and distribution of it in time was difficult.19
At least one of the hazard maps published in the prominent El Espectador newspaper in Bogotá included glaring errors. Without proper graphic scaling, it was unclear how big the map's hazard zones really were. The lahars on the map did not have a distinct ending point, and the main threat seemed to be from pyroclastic flows, not from mudflows. Though the map was colored blue, green, red, and yellow, there was no key to indicate what each color represented, and Armero was located in the green zone (believed to indicate the safest area). Another map published by the El Tiempo newspaper featured illustrations which "gave a perception of topography to the public unfamiliar with maps, allowing them to relate hazard zones to the landscape." In spite of this presentation that was keyed to the audience, the map ended up a more artistic representation of the risk than a purely scientific one.19
The day of the eruption, black ash columns erupted from the volcano at approximately 3:00 pm local time. The local Civil Defense director was promptly alerted to the situation. He contacted INGEOMINAS, which ruled that the area should be evacuated; he was then told to contact the Civil Defense directors in Bogotá and Tolima. Between 5:00 and 7:00 pm, the ash stopped falling, and local officials instructed people to "stay calm" and go inside. Around 5:00 pm an emergency committee meeting was called, and when it ended at 7:00 pm, several members contacted the regional Red Cross over the intended evacuation efforts at Armero, Mariquita, and Honda. The Ibagué Red Cross contacted Armero's officials and ordered an evacuation, which was not carried out because of electrical problems caused by a storm. The storm's heavy rain and constant thunder may have overpowered the noise of the volcano, and with no systematic warning efforts, the residents of Armero were completely unaware of the continuing activity at Ruiz. At 9:45 pm, after the volcano had erupted, Civil Defense officials from Ibagué and Murillo tried to warn Armero's officials, but could not make contact. Later they overheard conversations between individual officials of Armero and others; famously, a few heard the Mayor of Armero speaking on a ham radio, saying "that he did not think there was much danger", when he was overtaken by the lahar.20
At 9:09 pm, on November 13, 1985,21 Nevado del Ruiz ejected dacitic tephra more than 30 kilometers (20 mi) into the atmosphere.13 The total mass of the erupted material (including magma) was 35 million metric tons13 – only three percent of the amount that erupted from Mount St. Helens in 1980.22 The eruption reached 3 on the Volcanic Explosivity Index.23 The mass of the ejected sulfur dioxide was about 700,000 metric tons, or about two percent of the mass of the erupted solid material,13 making the eruption unusually sulfur rich.24
The eruption produced pyroclastic flows that melted summit glaciers and snow, generating four thick lahars that raced down river valleys on the volcano's flanks,25 destroying a small lake that was observed in Arenas' crater several months before the eruption. Water in such volcanic lakes tends to be extremely salty, and may contain dissolved volcanic gases. The lake's hot, acidic water significantly accelerated the melting of the ice, an effect confirmed by the large amounts of sulfates and chlorides found in the lahar flow.13
The lahars, formed of water, ice, pumice, and other rocks,25 incorporated clay from eroding soil as they traveled down the volcano's flanks.26 They ran down the volcano's sides at an average speed of 60 kilometers (40 mi) per hour, dislodging rock and destroying vegetation. After descending thousands of meters down the side of the volcano, the lahars followed the six river valleys leading from the volcano, where they grew to almost four times their original volume. In the Gualí River, a lahar reached a maximum width of 50 meters (160 ft).25
Survivors in Armero described the night as "quiet". Volcanic ash had been falling throughout the day, but residents were informed it was nothing to worry about. Later in the afternoon, ash began falling again after a long period of quiet. Local radio stations reported that residents should remain calm and ignore the material. One survivor reported going to the fire department to be informed that the ash was "nothing".27
During the night, the electrical power suddenly turned off and the radios went silent. Just before 11:30 pm, a huge stream of water swept through Armero; it was powerful enough to flip cars and pick up people. A loud roar could be heard from the mountain, but the residents were panicked over what they believed to be a flood.28
At 11:30 pm, the first lahar hit, followed shortly by the others.28 One of the lahars virtually erased Armero; three-quarters of its 28,700 inhabitants were killed.25 Proceeding in three major waves, this lahar was 30 meters (100 ft) deep, moved at 12 meters per second (39 ft/s), and lasted ten to twenty minutes. Traveling at about 6 meters (20 ft) per second, the second lahar lasted thirty minutes and was followed by smaller pulses. A third major pulse brought the lahar's duration to roughly two hours; by that point, 85 percent of Armero was enveloped in mud. Survivors described people holding on to debris from their homes in attempts to stay above the mud. Buildings collapsed, crushing people and raining down debris. The front of the lahar contained boulders and cobbles which would have crushed anyone in their path, while the slower parts were dotted by fine, sharp stones which caused lacerations. Mud moved into open wounds and other open body parts – the eyes, ears, and mouth – and placed pressure capable of inducing traumatic asphyxia in one or two minutes upon people buried in it. Martí and Ernst state in their work Volcanoes and the Environment that they believe that many who survived the lahars succumbed to their injuries as they were trapped, or contracted hypothermia – though the latter is unlikely, given that survivors described the water as warm.29
Another lahar, which descended through the valley of the Chinchina River, killed about 1,800 people and destroyed 400 homes in Chinchina.5 In total, more than 23,000 people were killed, approximately 5,000 were injured, and 5,000 homes25 throughout thirteen villages27 were destroyed. Some 230,000 people were affected, 27,000 acres (110 km2) were disrupted, and there were nearly 20,000 survivor-refugees.30 The Armero tragedy, as the event came to be known, was the second-deadliest volcanic disaster of the 20th century, surpassed only by the 1902 eruption of Mount Pelée,31 and is the fourth-deadliest volcanic eruption recorded since 1500 AD.32 It is also the deadliest lahar,33 and Colombia's worst natural disaster.34
The loss of life was exacerbated by the lack of an accurate timeframe for the eruption and the unwillingness of local authorities to take costly preventative measures without clear signs of imminent danger.35 Because its last substantial eruption had occurred 140 years earlier, in 1845, it was difficult for many to accept the danger presented by the volcano; locals even called it the "Sleeping Lion."8 Hazard maps showing that Armero would be completely flooded after an eruption were distributed more than a month before the eruption, but the Colombian Congress criticized the scientific and civil defense agencies for scaremongering.citation needed The eruption occurred at the height of guerrilla warfare in Bogotá, Colombia's capital, and so the government and army were occupied at the time of the eruption.15
The day after the eruption, relief workers were appalled at its impact. The lahars had left behind a gray mass which covered the entire town. Armero was dotted with broken trees and horribly disfigured human bodies.36 Debris from huts and homes protruded from beneath the gray mud. A few bags filled with crops were discovered in the mud. Workers described an acrid smell of "rotting bodies, [...] wood smoke and decaying vegetables."4 To the horror of these workers, who were scrambling to begin relief efforts, survivors let out moans of pain and agony. The damages were assessed at seven billion dollars, an amount approximately one-fifth of Colombia's 1985 Gross National Product.36
As news of the catastrophe spread around the world, the ongoing presidential election stopped, and the guerrilla fighters stopped their campaign "in view of the painful tragedy that has befallen our [the Colombian fighters] nation." Tickets for Colombian national championship soccer games added a surcharge of five cents to go to relief efforts.37
Scientists who later analyzed the seismograph data noticed that several long-period earthquakes (which begin strongly and then slowly die out) had occurred in the final hours before the eruption. Volcanologist Bernard Chouet said that, "the volcano was screaming 'I'm about to explode'", but the scientists who were studying the volcano at the time of the eruption were not able to read the signal.38
The eruption occurred at the same time as the 1985 Mexico City earthquake, limiting the amount of supplies that could be sent to each of the disasters.39 Efforts were organized in Ibagué and Bogotá for Armero and in Cali for Chinchina, where medical teams gathered. Makeshift triage stations were established in Lerida, Guayabal, and Mariquita, and soon were overwhelmed with the sheer number of victims. The remaining victims were directed to Ibagué's hospitals, as local institutions had already been destroyed or were at risk from further lahars.18
The US government spent over $1 million in aid, and US Ambassador to Colombia Charles S. Gillespie, Jr. donated an initial $25,000 to Colombian disaster assistance institutions. The Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance of the US Agency for International Development (AID) sent one member of the United States Geological Survey (USGS), along with an AID disaster-relief expert and 12 helicopters with support and medical personnel from Panama. The US subsequently sent additional aircraft and supplies, including 500 tents, 2,250 blankets, and several tent repair kits. Twenty-four other nations contributed to the rescue and assistance of survivors. Ecuador supplied a mobile hospital, and Iceland's Red Cross sent $4,650. The French government sent their own medical supplies with 1,300 tents. Japan sent $1.25 million, along with eight doctors, nurses, and engineers, plus $50,000 to the United Nations for relief efforts.39 Another $50,000 was donated by the Lions Clubs International Foundation.40
Rescue efforts were hindered by the soft mud that was up to 4.6 meters (15 ft) deep in some places,41 making it virtually impossible for anyone to traverse it without sinking in.42 To make the situation worse, the highway connected to Armero and several bridges to it had been demolished by the lahars.41 It took twelve hours for the first survivors to be rescued, so those with serious but treatable injuries probably died before the rescuers arrived. Because Armero's hospital was destroyed in the eruption, helicopters moved survivors to nearby hospitals. Six local towns set up makeshift emergency relief clinics, consisting of treatment areas and shelters for the homeless. To help with the treatment, physicians and rescue teams came from all over the country.42 Of the 1244 patients spread over the clinics, 150 died from infection or associated complications. Had antibiotics been readily available and all of their lacerations been thoroughly cleaned, many of these people could have been saved.29
On November 20, 1985, one week later, rescue efforts began to cease. Nearly 4,000 relief workers and rescue team members were still searching for survivors, with little hope of finding any. By then, the official death toll was registered at 22,540 people; additional counts showed that 3,300 were missing, 20,000 homeless, and 4,000 injured. Looters raided the ruins and survivors faced concerns of typhus and yellow fever. For most of the relief workers, their job was over.43
The eruption was used as an example for psychiatric recuperation after natural disasters by Robert Desjarlais and Leon Eisenberg in their work World Mental Health: Problems and Priorities in Low-Income Countries. The authors were concerned that only initial treatment for the survivors' trauma was conducted. One study showed that the victims of the eruption suffered from anxiety and depression, which can lead to alcohol abuse, marital problems and other social issues.42 Rafael Ruiz, an Army Major who briefly served as Armero's provisional mayor after the disaster, stated that there were survivors who, due to the trauma of the event, were "jittery", experienced "nightmares", and suffered from "emotional problems." He added that the progress made by Christmas of 1985 was considerable, but that there was "still a long way to go."44
A lack of preparation for the disaster contributed to the high death toll. Armero had been built on an alluvial fan5 that had been overrun by historic mudflows; authorities had ignored a hazard-zone map that showed the potential damage to the town from lahars. Residents stayed inside their dwellings to avoid the falling ash, as local officials had instructed them to do, not thinking that they might be buried by the mudflows.6
The disaster gained international notoriety due in part to a photograph taken by photographer Frank Fournier of a young girl named Omayra Sánchez, who was trapped beneath rubble for three days before she died.45 Following the eruption relief workers gathered around the girl, speaking with her and listening to her responses. She attracted the attention of the reporters at the site because of her sense of dignity and courage, and caused controversy when people wondered why the media workers had not saved her (which was impossible without equipment). An appeal to the government for a pump to lower the water around her was left unanswered, and she succumbed to gangrene and hypothermia after 60 hours of being trapped. Her death epitomized the tragic nature of the Armero disaster – she could have been saved had the government responded promptly and addressed the concerns over the volcano's potency.45 The photograph earned the World Press Photo of the Year for "capturing the event of greatest journalistic importance".12
Two photographers from the Miami Herald won a Pulitzer Prize for photographing the effects of the lahar.46 Dr. Stanley Williams of Louisiana State University said that following the eruption, "With the possible exception of Mount St. Helens in the state of Washington, no other volcano in the Western Hemisphere is being watched so elaborately."47 In response to the eruption, the USGS Volcano Crisis Assistance Team was formed in 1986,48 and the Volcano Disaster Assistance Program.49 The volcano erupted several more times between 1985 and 1994.10
Concerns over the alleged negligence of local officials to alert locals of the volcano's threat led to controversy. The mayor of Armero (Ramon Rodriguez) and other local officials had tried to bring the volcano's potential to the attention of the Colombian government, but to no avail. For months, Rodriguez appealed to various officials, including congressmen and the Governor of Tolima Department. Rodriguez once referred to the volcano as a "time bomb" and told reporters that he believed an eruption would disrupt the natural dam above Armero, resulting in floods. Despite his persistence, only one congressman managed to inquire about the reality of the situation. Reports from the Colombian Minister of Mines, Minister of Defence, and Minister of Public Works "all asserted that the government was aware of the risk from the volcano and was acting to protect the population". The lack of responsibility for the disaster prompted lawmakers to campaign for Tolima's governor (Eduardo Alzate Garcia) to resign. In the media, similar thoughts and questions were hotly debated. One of the most aggressive campaigns came from a mass funeral in Ibagué for the victims, claiming that "The volcano didn't kill 22,000 people. The government killed them."30
The volcano continues to pose a serious threat to nearby towns and villages. Of the threats, the one with the most potential for danger is that of small-volume eruptions, which can destabilize glaciers and trigger lahars.50 Although much of the volcano's glacier mass has retreated, a significant volume of ice still sits atop Nevado del Ruiz and other volcanoes in the Ruiz–Tolima massif. Melting just 10 percent of the ice would produce lahars with a volume of up to 200 million cubic meters – similar to the lahar that destroyed Armero in 1985. In just hours, these lahars can travel up to 100 km along river valleys.33 Estimates show that up to 500,000 people living in the Combeima, Chinchina, Coello-Toche, and Guali valleys are at risk, with 100,000 individuals being considered to be at high risk.50 Lahars pose a threat to the nearby towns of Honda, Mariquita, Ambalema, Chinchina, Herveo, Villa Hermosa, Salgar and La Dorada.51 Although small eruptions are more likely, the two-million-year eruptive history of the Ruiz–Tolima massif includes numerous large eruptions, indicating that the threat of a large eruption cannot be ignored.50 A large eruption would have more widespread effects, including the potential closure of Bogotá's airport due to ashfall.52
As the Armero tragedy was exacerbated by the lack of early warnings,35 unwise land use,53 and the unpreparedness of nearby communities,35 the government of Colombia created a special program, the Oficina Nacional para la Atención de Desastres (National Office for Disaster Preparedness), now known as the Dirección de Prevención y Atención de Desastres (Directorate for Disaster Prevention and Preparedness)54 – to prevent such incidents in the future. All Colombian cities were directed to promote prevention planning to mitigate the consequences of natural disasters,53 and evacuations due to volcanic hazards have been carried out. About 2,300 people living along five nearby rivers were evacuated when Nevado del Ruiz erupted again in 1989.55 When another Colombian volcano, Nevado del Huila, erupted in April 2008, thousands of people were evacuated because volcanologists worried that the eruption could be another "Nevado del Ruiz".56
A little less than one year later, Pope John Paul II flew over Armero and then visited Lérida's refugee camps with Colombian President Belisario Betancur.58 He spoke about the disaster and declared the site of Armero "holy land".12 Although many victims of the disaster were commemorated, Omayra Sanchez in particular was immortalized by poems, novels, and music pieces. One work (Adios, Omayra) by Eduardo Santa illustrated the girl's last days of life and her symbolism of the catastrophe.12 Survivors were also recognized in Germán Santa María Barragán's dramatized television special titled "No Morirás" (You Will Not Die). Much of the cast was composed of victims of the tragedy who appeared at the cast calls to be extras.59
- "Nevado del Ruiz". Global Volcanism Program, Smithsonian Institution. http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/volcano.cfm?vnum=1501-02%3D. Retrieved June 1, 2010.
- Schuster, Robert L. and Highland, Lynn M. (2001). Socioeconomic and Environmental Impacts of Landslides in the Western Hemisphere, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01-0276. Also previously published in the Proceedings of the Third Panamerican Symposium on Landslides, July 29 to August 3, 2001, Cartagena, Colombia. Castaneda Martinez, Jorge E., and Olarte Montero, Juan, eds. Retrieved June 11, 2010.
- "Wall of Mud Seals Town; 20,000 Could Be Dead". Ocala Star-Banner. November 15, 1985. Retrieved July 22, 2010.
- Cooke, Robert (November 20, 1985). "Facing tragedy: Not enough tears to wash away sorrow". The Miami News. Retrieved July 22, 2010.
- Mileti et. al, p. 1.
- Topinka, Lyn (July 26, 2000). "Hazard-Zone Maps and Volcanic Risk". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved September 5, 2010.
- Mileti et. al, 1991, p. 9.
- BBC contributors (November 13, 1985). "BBC:On this day: November 13: 1985: Volcano kills thousands in Colombia". British Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved September 3, 2009.
- Mileti et. al, 1991, p. 10.
- "Nevado del Ruiz: Eruptive History". Global Volcanism Program, Smithsonian Institution. http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/volcano.cfm?vnum=1501-02%3D%26volpage%3Derupt. Retrieved December 13, 2008.
- "Colombia Volcanoes and Volcanics". United States Geological Survey. 2001. Retrieved September 3, 2008.
- Zeiderman, Austin (June 11, 2009). "Life at Risk: Biopolitics, Citizenship, and Security in Colombia". 2009 Congress of the Latin American Studies Association. Retrieved July 22, 2010.
- Naranjo, J.L., Siggurdsson, H., Carey, S.N., and Fritz, W. (August 1986). "Eruption of the Nevado del Ruiz Volcano, Colombia, On 13 November 1985: Tephra Fall and Lahars". Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 233 (4767): 991–993. Bibcode:1986Sci...233..961N. doi:10.1126/science.233.4767.961. PMID 17732038.
- Barberi, F., Martini, M., and Rosi, M., F; M Martinia; M Rosi (July 1990). "Nevado del Ruiz volcano (Colombia): pre-eruption observations and the 13 November 1985 catastrophic event". Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research (Elsevier) 42 (1–2): 1–12. Bibcode:1990JVGR...42....1B. doi:10.1016/0377-0273(90)90066-O.
- Hawaiian Volcano Observatory (November 29, 2009). "Lessons Learned from the Armero, Colombia Tragedy". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved July 20, 2010.
- Giggenbach, W.F., Garcia P, N., Rodriguez V., L., Londoño C, A., Rojas G., N., Calvache V., M.L., W; Garciap, N; Londonoc, A; Rodriguezv, L; Rojasg, N; Calvachev, M (July 1990). "The chemistry of fumarolic vapor and thermal-spring discharges from the Nevado del Ruiz volcanic-magmatic-hydrothermal system, Colombia". Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research (Elsevier) 42 (1–2): 13–39. Bibcode:1990JVGR...42...13G. doi:10.1016/0377-0273(90)90067-P.
- Villegas, p. 5.
- Gueri, Miguel (October 2004). "Eruption of El Ruiz Volcano, Colombia". UNAN-León. Retrieved July 22, 2010.
- Villegas, p. 6.
- Mileti et. al, pp. 58–64.
- Mileti et al., p. 13.
- Wright, T.L., and Pierson, T.C. (1992). Living with Volcanoes: The U. S. Geological Survey's Volcano Hazards Program: USGS Circular 1073. United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 11 November 2008. Retrieved December 13, 2008.
- Watson, John. "Mount St. Helens – Comparisons With Other Eruptions". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved September 20, 2008.
- Krueger, A., Walter, L., Schnetzler, C., and Doiron, S. (July 1990). "TOMS measurement of the sulfur dioxide emitted during the 1985 Nevado del Ruiz eruptions" (Elsevier). Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research (Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research) 41 (1–4): 7–15. Bibcode:1990JVGR...41....7K. doi:10.1016/0377-0273(90)90081-P. Retrieved 2011-06-22.
- "Deadly Lahars from Nevado del Ruiz, Colombia: November 13, 1985". United States Geological Survey. September 30, 1999. Retrieved November 25, 2008.
- Lowe, Donald R., Williams, Stanley N., Leigh, Henry, Connort, Charles B., Gemmell, J. Bruce, and Stoiber, Richard E. (November 1986). "Lahars initiated by the 13 November 1985 eruption of Nevado del Ruiz, Colombia". Nature (Nature Publishing Group) 324 (6092): 51–53. Bibcode:1986Natur.324...51L. doi:10.1038/324051a0. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
- Angelo, Chris (November 16, 1985). "Officials evacuate valley in Colombia". Kentucky New Era. Retrieved July 26, 2010.
- Martí and Ernst, p. 290.
- Martí and Ernst, p. 291.
- Montalbano, William D. (December 12, 1985). "Three weeks after volcano tragedy Colombia shrouded in controversy". Ottawa Citizen. Retrieved July 31, 2010.
- Staff. "Nevado del Ruiz – Facts and Figures". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Archived from the original on 25 September 2008. Retrieved September 3, 2008.
- Topinka, Lyn. "Deadliest Volcanic Eruptions Since 1500 A.D.". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved September 20, 2008.
- Huggel, Cristian, Ceballos, Jorge Luis, Pulgarín, Bernardo, Ramírez, Jair, and Thouret, Jean-Claude (2007). "Review and reassessment of hazards owing to volcano–glacier interactions in Colombia" (PDF). Annals of Glaciology (International Glaciological Society) 45: 128–136. Bibcode:2007AnGla..45..128H. doi:10.3189/172756407782282408. Retrieved August 31, 2010.
- Staff (November 14, 1995). "World News Briefs". CNN. Retrieved September 20, 2008.
- Fielding, Emma. "Volcano Hell Transcript". BBC. Retrieved September 3, 2008.
- Camp, Vic. "How Volcanoes Work – the Nevado del Ruiz eruption". SDSU Department of Geological Sciences. San Diego State University. Archived from the original on 24 July 2010. Retrieved July 20, 2010.
- "Armero tragedy may hold seeds of future strife". Tri City Herald. November 24, 1985. Retrieved July 21, 2010.
- BBC contributors (August 27, 2003). "Signs of an eruption – A scientist has found a way to use earthquakes to predict when volcanoes will erupt". BBC. Retrieved September 13, 2008.
- "Colombia's pleas for disaster aid draw worldwide response". Christian Science Monitor. November 19, 1985. Retrieved November 28, 2008.
- Colombia, Mexico Tragedies: Lions Respond Through LCIF. Lions Club International. Archived from the original on 12 June 2011. Retrieved 2011-06-22.
- "20,000 Colombians Killed in Fiery Eruption". Spartanburg Herald-Journal. November 15, 1985. Retrieved July 22, 2010.
- Desjarlais and Eisenberg, p. 30.
- "Rescue hopes fade in volcano tragedy". Tri-City Herald. November 20, 1985. Retrieved July 28, 2010.
- Gallardo, Eduardo (December 22, 1985). "Christmas sorrowful for mudslide survivors". Lakeland Ledger. Retrieved July 22, 2010.
- "Picture power: Tragedy of Omayra Sanchez". BBC. September 30, 2005. Archived from the original on 3 August 2010. Retrieved July 20, 2010.
- "Winners of Pulitzer Prizes in Journalism, Letters, and the Arts". New York Times. April 16, 1986. Retrieved November 11, 2008.
- Sullivan, Walter (May 31, 1988). "At Ice-Clad Volcanoes, Vigils for Disaster". New York Times. Retrieved September 24, 2008.
- Russell-Robinson, Susan. "US team moves as Caribbean volcano dusts town with volcanic ash". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved September 20, 2008.
- Weiner, Tim (January 2, 2001). "Watchful Eyes On a Violent Giant". New York Times. Retrieved September 24, 2008.
- Thouret, Jean-Claude, Murcia, A, Salinas, R, et al. (1990). "Stratigraphy and quaternary eruptive history of the Ruiz-Tolima volcanic massif, Colombia. Implications for assessment of volcanic hazards" (PDF). Symposium international géodynamique andine: résumés des communications. Paris. pp. 391–393. Retrieved July 22, 2010.
- Mileti et. al, p. 80.
- McDowell, Bart (May 1986). "Eruption in Colombia". National Geographic: 640–653. Archived from the original on 2009-11-01.
- Touret, Jean-Claude, and Laforge, Christophe (1994). "Hazard Appraisal and Hazard-Zone Mapping of Flooding and Debris Flowage in the Rio Combeima Valley and Ibague City, Tolima Department, Colombia". GeoJournal 34 (4): 407–413. Retrieved August 31, 2010.
- (Spanish) "Dirección de Prevención y Atención de Desastres — DPAD". Departamento Nacional de Planeación, República de Colombia. June 24, 2010. Retrieved September 1, 2010.
- Associated Press (September 2, 1989). "Colombian Volcano Erupting". New York Times. Retrieved September 20, 2008.
- Associated Press (April 15, 2008). "Colombian Volcano Erupts, Thousands Evacuated". Fox News. Retrieved September 20, 2008.
- "PRESS RELEASE: Mount Rainier Debris-Flow Maps available from USGS". USGS. November 22, 2002. Retrieved November 9, 2010.
- "Pope visits site of volcano tragedy". Lakeland Ledger. July 7, 1986. Retrieved October 21, 2011.
- Johnson, Tim (September 18, 1997). "Survivors of avalanche relive tragedy through TV movie". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved July 31, 2010.
- Desjarlais, Robert and Eisenberg, Leon (1996). World Mental Health: Problems and Priorities in Low-Income Countries. Oxford University Press US. ISBN 0-19-509540-5.
- Martí, Joan and Ernst, Gerald (2005). Volcanoes and the Environment. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-59254-2.
- Mileti, Dennis S., Bolton, Patricia A., Fernandez, Gabriel, and Updike, Randall G. (1991). The Eruption of Nevado Del Ruiz Volcano Colombia, South America, November 13, 1985. Washington, D.C.: Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems (National Academy Press). ISBN 0-309-04477-4.
- Villegas, Henry (September 2003). "Display of the Nevado del Ruiz Volcanic Hazard Map Using GIS". Geocarto International (Geocarto International Centre) 18 (3): 5–13. doi:10.1080/10106040308542276. Retrieved July 20, 2010.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Armero tragedy.|
- (Spanish) Armando Armero, website for the project to commemorate and remember Armero
- (Spanish) Looking for adopted children from Armero's tragedy: http://ninosarmerocolombia.blogspot.com/ -->armandoarmero.com
- Video about emergency response to the tragedy (15 minutes), Pan American Health Organization (hosted on YouTube)
- Colombia's Mortal Agony (by George Russell), article from 2005 in TIME magazine
- Information about Armero (tripod.com)
- (Spanish) Text of the prayer made by Pope John Paul II in July 1986 at the memorial for the victims (Vatican website)
- Getty image of Pope John Paul II praying at the memorial (nhl.msg.com)
- Collection of photographs of the area and the memorials, from Luis Manuel Silva