Northrop YF-23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
YF-23
Northrop YF-23 DFRC.jpg
YF-23, nicknamed Gray Ghost (foreground), flying with YF-23 Black Widow II
Role Experimental fighter prototype
National origin United States
Manufacturer Northrop/McDonnell Douglas
First flight 27 August 1990
Status Canceled
Primary user United States Air Force
Number built 2

The Northrop/McDonnell Douglas YF-23 was an American single-seat, twin-engine fighter aircraft designed for the United States Air Force (USAF). The design was a finalist in the USAF's Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) competition, battling the Lockheed YF-22 for a production contract. Two YF-23 prototypes were built with the nicknames "Black Widow II" and "Gray Ghost".

In the 1980s, the USAF began looking for a replacement for its fighter aircraft, especially to counter the USSR's advanced Sukhoi Su-27 and Mikoyan MiG-29. Several companies submitted design proposals; the USAF selected proposals from Northrop and Lockheed. Northrop teamed with McDonnell Douglas to develop the YF-23, while Lockheed, Boeing and General Dynamics developed the YF-22.

The YF-23 was stealthier and faster, but less agile than its competitor. After a four-year development and evaluation process, the YF-22 was announced the winner in 1991 and entered production as the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor. The U.S. Navy considered using the production version of the ATF as the basis for a replacement to the F-14, but these plans were later canceled. The two YF-23 prototypes were museum exhibits as of 2009.12

Development

American reconnaissance satellites first spotted the advanced Soviet Su-27 and MiG-29 fighter prototypes in 1978, which caused concern in the U.S. Both Soviet models were expected to reduce the maneuverability advantage of contemporary US fighter aircraft.3 In 1981, the USAF requested information from several aerospace companies on possible features for an Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) to replace the F-15 Eagle. After discussions with aerospace companies, the USAF made air to air combat the primary role for the ATF.4 The ATF was to take advantage of emerging technologies, including composite materials, lightweight alloys, advanced flight-control systems, more powerful propulsion systems, and stealth technology.1 In October 1985, the USAF issued a request for proposal (RFP) to several aircraft manufacturers. The RFP was modified in May 1986 to include evaluation of prototypes from the two finalists. At the same time, the U.S. Navy, under the Navalized Advanced Tactical Fighter (NATF) program, announced that it would use a derivative of the ATF winner to replace its F-14 Tomcat. The NATF program called for procurement of 546 aircraft along with the USAF's planned procurement of 750 aircraft.5

Top view of black jet aircraft, showing trapezoidal wings, engine nozzle, and two-piece tail. The separation between the forward fuselage and engine nacelles are apparent.
Top view of the YF-23, showing the trapezoidal wings and separation between the forward fuselage and engine nacelles

In July 1986, proposals were submitted by Lockheed, Boeing, General Dynamics, McDonnell Douglas, Northrop, Grumman and Rockwell. The latter two dropped out of competition shortly thereafter.6 Following proposal submissions, Lockheed, Boeing, and General Dynamics formed a team to develop whichever of their proposed designs was selected, if any. Northrop and McDonnell Douglas formed a team with a similar agreement.7 The Lockheed and Northrop proposals were selected as finalists on 31 October 1986. Both teams were given 50 months to build and flight-test their prototypes, and they were successful, producing the Lockheed YF-22 and the Northrop YF-23.8

The YF-23 was designed to meet USAF requirements for survivability, supercruise, stealth, and ease of maintenance.9 Supercruise requirements called for prolonged supersonic flight without the use of afterburners.10 Northrop drew on its experience with the B-2 Spirit and F/A-18 Hornet to reduce the model's susceptibility to radar and infrared detection.11 The USAF initially required the aircraft to land and stop within 2,000 feet (610 m), which meant the use of thrust reversers on their engines. In 1987, the USAF changed the runway length requirement to 3,000 feet (914 m), so thrust reversers were no longer needed. This allowed the aircraft to have smaller engine nacelle housings. The nacelles were not downsized on the prototypes.1213

The first YF-23 (serial number 87-0800), Prototype Air Vehicle 1 (PAV-1), was rolled out on 22 June 1990;14 PAV-1 took its 50-minute maiden flight on 27 August with Alfred "Paul" Metz at the controls.15 The second YF-23 (serial number 87-0801, PAV-2) made its first flight on 26 October, piloted by Jim Sandberg.16 The first YF-23 was painted charcoal gray and was nicknamed "Spider"16 and "Black Widow II", the latter after the Northrop P-61 Black Widow of World War II. It briefly had a red hourglass marking resembling the marking on the underside of the black widow spider before Northrop management had it removed.1718N 1 The second prototype was painted in two shades of gray and nicknamed "Gray Ghost".19

Design

Front view of jet aircraft showing curving exterior. The tail is V-shaped.
A front view of 87–0801 showing the curving exterior of the design.

The YF-23 was an unconventional-looking aircraft, with diamond-shaped wings, a profile with substantial area-ruling to reduce drag at trans-sonic speeds, and an all-moving V-tail. The cockpit was placed high, near the nose of the aircraft for good visibility for the pilot. The aircraft featured a tricycle landing gear configuration with a nose landing gear leg and two main landing gear legs. The weapons bay was placed on the underside of the fuselage between the nose and main landing gear.20 The cockpit has a center stick and side throttle.21

It was powered by two turbofan engines with each in a separate engine nacelle on either side of the aircraft's spine.22 Of the two aircraft built, the first YF-23 (PAV-1) was fitted with Pratt & Whitney YF119 engines, while the second (PAV-2) was powered by General Electric YF120 engines. The aircraft featured fixed engine nozzles, instead of thrust vectoring nozzles as on the YF-22.12 As on the B-2, the exhaust from the YF-23's engines flowed through troughs lined with heat-ablating tiles to dissipate heat and shield the engines from infrared (IR) missile detection from below.11

The flight control surfaces were controlled by a central management computer system. Raising the wing flaps and ailerons on one side and lowering them on the other provided roll. The V-tail fins were angled 50 degrees from the vertical. Pitch was mainly provided by rotating these V-tail fins in opposite directions so their front edges moved together or apart. Yaw was primarily supplied by rotating the tail fins in the same direction. Deflecting the wing flaps down and ailerons up on both sides simultaneously provided for aerodynamic braking.23

To keep costs low despite the novel design, a number of "off-the-shelf" components were used, including an F-15 nose wheel, F/A-18 main landing gear parts, and the forward cockpit components of the F-15E Strike Eagle.1116

Operational history

A YF-22 in the foreground with a YF-23 in the background

Evaluation

The first YF-23, with Pratt & Whitney engines, supercruised at Mach 1.43 on 18 September 1990, while the second, with General Electric engines, reached Mach 1.6 on 29 November 1990. By comparison, the YF-22 achieved Mach 1.58 in supercruise.24 The YF-23 was tested to a top speed of Mach 1.8 with afterburners. The YF-23's weapons bay was configured for weapons launch, and used for testing weapons bay acoustics, but no missiles were fired. Lockheed fired AIM-9 Sidewinder and AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles successfully from its YF-22 demonstration aircraft. PAV-1 performed a fast-paced combat demonstration with six flights over a 10-hour period on 30 November 1990. Flight testing continued into December.25 The two YF-23s flew 50 times for a total of 65.2 hours.26 The tests demonstrated Northrop's predicted performance values for the YF-23.27 The YF-23 was stealthier and faster, but the YF-22 was more agile.2829

The two contractor teams submitted evaluation results with their proposals in December 1990,27 and on 23 April 1991, Secretary of the Air Force Donald Rice announced that the YF-22 was the winner.30 The Air Force selected the YF119 engine to power the F-22 production version. The Lockheed and Pratt & Whitney designs were rated higher on technical aspects, were considered lower risks, and were considered to have more effective program management.3031 It has been speculated in the aviation press that the YF-22 was also seen as more adaptable to the Navy's NATF, but by 1992 the U.S. Navy had abandoned NATF.3233

Following the competition, both YF-23s were transferred to NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards AFB, California, without their engines.1134 NASA planned to use one of the aircraft to study techniques for the calibration of predicted loads to measured flight results, but this did not take place.34

Possible revival

In late 2004, Northrop Grumman proposed a YF-23-based bomber to meet a USAF need for an interim bomber, for which the FB-22 and B-1R were also competing.35 Northrop modified aircraft PAV-2 to serve as a display model for its proposed interim bomber.27 The possibility of a YF-23-based interim bomber ended with the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review, which favored a long-range bomber with a much greater range.3637 The USAF has since begun the Next-Generation Bomber program.38

Aircraft on display

Restoration work at the USAF Museum

Both YF-23 airframes remained in storage until mid-1996, when the aircraft were transferred to museums.34

Specifications (YF-23)

A rear view of a YF-23, showing its tile-lined exhaust channels

Data from Pace,41 Sweetman,42 Winchester,11 National Museum of the U.S. Air Force1

General characteristics

Performance

Armament

None as tested but provisions made for:11

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era
Related lists

References

Notes

  1. ^ Sources describe the first YF-23 fighter as being dray gray or black colored.1718

Citations

  1. ^ a b c "Northrop-McDonnell Douglas YF-23." National Museum of the U.S. Air Force, 11 February 2009. Retrieved: 19 June 2011.
  2. ^ a b "Static Displays". "Northrop YF-23A 'Black Widow II'". Western Museum of Flight. Retrieved: 31 August 2011.
  3. ^ Rich, Michael and William Stanley. Improving U.S. Air Force Readiness and Sustainability. Rand Publications, April 1984. p. 7.
  4. ^ Sweetman 1991, pp. 10–13.
  5. ^ Williams 2002, p. 5.
  6. ^ Miller 2005, pp. 13–14, 19.
  7. ^ Goodall 1992, p. 94.
  8. ^ Jenkins and Landis 2008, pp. 233–234.
  9. ^ "ATF procurement launches new era". Flight International, 15 November 1986. p. 10. Retrieved: 25 June 2011.
  10. ^ Goodall 1992, p. 91.
  11. ^ a b c d e f g Winchester 2005, pp. 198–199.
  12. ^ a b Miller 2005, p. 23.
  13. ^ Sweetman 1991, pp. 23, 43.
  14. ^ "YF-23 roll out marks ATF debut." Flight International, 27 June–3 July 1990. p. 5. Retrieved: 24 June 2011.
  15. ^ Goodall 1992, p. 99.
  16. ^ a b c Jenkins and Landis 2008, p. 237.
  17. ^ a b Goodall 1992, p. 120.
  18. ^ a b Miller 2005, p. 37.
  19. ^ Pace 1999, p. 50c.
  20. ^ Goodall 1992, pp. 108–15, 124.
  21. ^ Walkaround. yf-23.net
  22. ^ Sweetman 1991, pp. 42–44, 55.
  23. ^ Sweetman 1991, pp. 34–35, 43–45.
  24. ^ Goodall 1992, pp. 102–103.
  25. ^ Miller 2005, pp. 36, 39.
  26. ^ Norris, Guy. "NASA could rescue redundant YF-23s." Flight International, 5–11 June 1991. p. 16. Retrieved: 25 June 2011.
  27. ^ a b c Miller 2005, pp. 38–39.
  28. ^ Goodall 1992, p. 110.
  29. ^ Sweetman 1991, p. 55.
  30. ^ a b Jenkins and Landis 2008, p. 234.
  31. ^ Miller 2005, p. 38.
  32. ^ Miller 2005, p. 76.
  33. ^ Williams 2002, p. 6.
  34. ^ a b c d "YF-23." NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, 20 January 1996. Retrieved: 25 June 2011.
  35. ^ Hebert, Adam J. "Long-Range Strike in a Hurry." Air Force magazine, November 2004. Retrieved: 24 June 2011.
  36. ^ "Quadrennial Defense Review Report." U.S. Department of Defense, 6 February 2006. Retrieved: 25 June 2011.
  37. ^ Hebert, Adam J. "The 2018 Bomber and Its Friends." Air Force magazine, October 2006. Retrieved: 24 June 2011.
  38. ^ Majumdar, Dave. "U.S. Air Force May Buy 175 Bombers." Defense News, 23 January 2011. Retrieved: 29 August 2011.
  39. ^ "Northrop-McDonnell Douglas YF-23A Black Widow II." "YF-23 images." National Museum of the U.S. Air Force, 26 August 2009. Retrieved: 31 August 2011.
  40. ^ Miller 2005, p. 39.
  41. ^ Pace 1999, pp. 14–15.
  42. ^ Sweetman 1991, p. 93.
  43. ^ a b Sweetman 1991, pp. 42–43.

Bibliography

  • Goodall, James C. "The Lockheed YF-22 and Northrop YF-23 Advanced Tactical Fighters". America's Stealth Fighters and Bombers, B-2, F-117, YF-22, and YF-23. St. Paul, Minnesota: Motorbooks International Publishing, 1992. ISBN 0-87938-609-6.
  • Jenkins, Dennis R. and Tony R. Landis. Experimental & Prototype U.S. Air Force Jet Fighters. North Branch, Minnesota: Specialty Press, 2008. ISBN 978-1-58007-111-6.
  • Miller, Jay. Lockheed Martin F/A-22 Raptor, Stealth Fighter. Hinckley, UK: Midland Publishing, 2005. ISBN 1-85780-158-X.
  • Pace, Steve. F-22 Raptor. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999. ISBN 0-07-134271-0.
  • Sweetman, Bill. YF-22 and YF-23 Advanced Tactical Fighters. St. Paul, Minnesota: Motorbooks International Publishing, 1991. ISBN 0-87938-505-7.
  • Williams, Mel (ed.). "Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor". Superfighters: The Next Generation of Combat Aircraft. London: AIRtime Publishing Inc., 2002. ISBN 1-880588-53-6. 
  • Winchester, Jim, ed. "Northrop/McDonnell Douglas YF-23". Concept Aircraft (The Aviation Factfile). Rochester, Kent, UK: Grange Books plc, 2005. ISBN 1-84013-809-2.

External links








Creative Commons License