In 2004, Tinkebell gained national notoriety in the Netherlands with a handbag she fabricated using the fur of her own house cat. She indicated to have killed the animal herself, by breaking its neck and skinning it. The goal of this work was to raise the question why it is accepted in society that production animals like cows and pigs are killed for consumption, but doing the same to pets is not. According to Tinkebell, the cat, aged two, was depressed to the point where it could no longer be left at home unattended.,3 in 2012 she explained this was a made up story to raise attention for her opinion about the different threatment of pets compared to other animals. The cat was actually very ill and would die of its disease.4 In June 2007, formal questions were raise in Dutch parliament by the Partij voor de Dieren because of a Tinkebell project. During an eco-design fair in Platform 21 in Amsterdam, she offered people to buy 60 male live chicks or otherwise dump the chicks into a shredder, to show how male chicks are treated in the bioindustry.5 In early 2008, Tinkebell again became a topic of conversation due to the exposition Save the pets, in which she had 95 hamsters running around in so-called hamsterballs in art gallery Masters in Amsterdam. She wanted to show how people treat their pets. Again, her basic concept was the dual morality people maintain in respect of animals, because nobody will protest a single hamster in a ball, but people will protest 95 hamsters in 95 balls. Again she was interviewed in several newspapers and Dutch tv-shows. On 24 January 2008, the Dutch animal welfare authority confiscated the hamsters. The Partij voor de Dieren again raised questions in parliament.
On 8 September 2009 and 6 May 2010, she was tried for the case in front of the police magistrate in Amsterdam. They eventually referred the case to a Dutch court specifically for complex or serious cases. There she was tried on 7 January 2011.6 On 21 January 2011, the court declared the allegations not proven and acquitted Tinkebell of them.7
Tinkebell's work resulted in a storm of publicity and criticism multiple times, including hate mail and death threats. Some of the hate mail and death threats (about 1% in total) were collected and bundled. In cooperation with Coralie Vogelaar, the people sending them were researched and both the hateful messages (according to the authors 'over a hundred thousand') and their profiles were published in the 2009 book Dearest Tinkebell. The published information includes personal information of the people, like name, address and social media profiles. Vogelaar was responsible for the research in what she called "the armpit of the internet", that is personal weblogs and social media profiles.89unreliable source?
In December 2012 she did a TEDx talk in Amsterdam. In this talk she tells about internet stories that appeared on blogs and on social media sites were fiction and/or gave a distorted vision of what actually had taken place. Google search results easily lead to these blogs and the result is that these stories became the new truth, leading to an even more controversial status as an artist4
- "Dutch Artist Famous for Skinning Pet Cat Publishes Expose on Authors of Hate Mail". FOX News. May 28, 2009. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
- Sandra Smallenburg. "Artist publishes hate mail received after killing her cat". NRC.nl.
- Pauw & Witteman, VARA, 14 mei 2009.
- SAVE THE MALES!, http://www.katinkasimonse.nl
- Boete geëist tegen kunstenares Tinkebell om hamsters, nu.nl
- LJN: BP1587, Rechtbank Amsterdam , 13/442043-08, rechtspraak.nl, 21 januari 2011
- Lekker Wreed! AVRO Kunst, 24 July 2010
- Marie-José Klaver, Naming & shaming in Dearest Tinkebell, NRC Weblogs, 15 May 2009. Retrieved 15 May 2009.
- Media related to TINKEBELL at Wikimedia Commons