I was once fluent in Esperanto, French and Tourist Italian. I can also count to ten in Spanish, Latin, German, Russian, Sanskrit, Japanese, Elvish; and can recite the alphabet in Greek and Hebrew.
I attended University Laboratory High School of Urbana, Illinois, but have not won a Nobel, Nebula, Pulitzer or Ig Nobel Prize. I do have two Knuth reward checks.
According to one who keeps track of such things, I was the first Libertarian in California to be endorsed for partisan office (Assembly) by a major daily newspaper (the San Francisco Examiner before Hearst Corporation sold it). This happened during the newspaper strike of 1994.
Tamfang, in case you were wondering, is intended as Elvish for copper beard.
The first element is attested (so far as I know) only in a footnote to an early version of The Chaining of Melko; but the later canonical word for copper is less euphonious, so I choose to assume that some form of tambe survived east of the Misty Mountains.
User:Tamfang/blazons (in sporadic progress) is a collection of blazons of "good" coats of arms – consistent with my notions of heraldic style – found in Wikipedia, so that I can find them when I want an illustration of a given feature.
User:Tamfang/QC cast is a count of appearances of each character (above a threshold) in Questionable Content, started in response to a dispute about who are the "major" characters worth listing in the article.
User:Tamfang/Stuart is a list of legitimate descendants of King James VI&I who were alive at some point between the flight of James II (1688) and the death of Queen Anne (1714), in the normal order of succession. See Act of Settlement 1701 for context. I chose those dates as forming convenient boundaries to the succession crisis.
Anyone who aspires to write well could do worse than to read A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. You need not agree with all of its recommendations (I don't) but the core principles are sound:
- Preserve useful distinctions between words.
- Structure your sentences so that they resist misunderstanding.
- Resist the temptation to show off with fancy synonyms.
(Caveat: I have not looked at the Burchfield edition.)
I'm a member of the vast majority of English-speakers who don't understand (for example) Czech; but I do know the difference between ‹c› and ‹č› and I want to know which it is so that I have a chance of pronouncing it more correctly. There presumably exist readers who can say the same of Vietnamese, and I want them to have the same benefit even if the diacritics are meaningless to me; I am not harmed by seeing the funny squiggles, now that Unicode fonts are generally available. If Wikipedia excluded everything that a substantial number of English-speakers don't understand, I wouldn't bother with it.
- This list is incomplete, but you needn't bother adding to it.
- the fact that — A sentence containing this phrase can nearly always be made shorter and better.
- refer to and describe are not synonyms. To refer to X as Z is to use Z as a substitute reference for X; this may implicitly describe X as Z, as in:
- You can vote for me, or you can vote for a crook.
- but the relation is not symmetric. This sentence:
- That movie with Rick and Ilsa is the best movie ever!
- refers to Casablanca as "that movie with Rick and Ilsa" and describes it as "the best movie ever".
- comprise and compose are (approximately) reciprocal, not synonyms. New York City is composed of five boroughs; New York City comprises five boroughs.
- seven-year anniversary — The correct phrase is seventh anniversary. An anniversary is when the year (anno) completes a turn (versu). It follows that there cannot be a six-month anniversary; call it a sixth mensiversary (or first semi-anniversary) if you don't mind being suspected of cleverness.
- false precision — Don't write $176 billion as $176,000,000,000.00; even if each of those zeroes is accurate (which is unlikely), it does the reader no good to have to count them.
- Percentage notation is generally not called for if you're talking about fewer than 100 of something. If you say fifty percent when you mean half, you're making the audience do more work than necessary.
- triangular-shaped — Is there any other way to be triangular?
- The X is just that: a X. Thank you for reminding us what that means; we might have forgotten it while absorbing the phrase "is just that".
- book attribution — This is a matter of style.
- In “Only the Paranoid Survive”, Dr Grove’s bestselling book, he argues ....
- This could sometimes mean that someone else (mentioned perhaps in the preceding sentence) argues, in a book edited by Grove. Where someone is mentioned by name and by a pronoun, the explicit name ought to be in the most prominent position, namely (if possible) the subject of the sentence. I'd make it:
- In his bestselling book "Only the Paranoid Survive", Dr Grove argues ....
- A framistan is a term that refers to ... — Too many articles begin like that! A name refers to a thing, but a thing is not its name and does not refer to itself; it is itself.
- Some of the notable examples include ... — What does that mean exactly? Of those notable examples that include the items listed, does each one include them? And do some other notable examples also include them? Either drop some of or change include to are.
- A suspect is a known person who is suspected of an act. The word should not be used for the unknown person who definitely did the act.
- contemporary means of the same time; to use it as a synonym for modern or recent risks ambiguity.
- A crucifix is something (e.g. an enemy of the state) affixed to a cross, not the cross itself; thus an unoccupied cross, no matter how ornate, is not a crucifix.
- A tragedy, in classical theatre, is a play in which a hero is ruined by his own flaws. I don't insist on such a narrow definition, but let's confine the words tragedy and tragic to consequences of human error. Other words like sorrow and misfortune and disaster are available for premeditated murder and act of god.
- late 1960s and early 1970s — Why not around 1970 ?
- X is (not) worth Y — Am I alone in thinking the cost is worth the benefit makes no sense?
- decided to; managed to — Both can usually be omitted without changing meaning. An exception: where there was a significant delay between the decision and the action, as in: It was then that X decided to Z at the next opportunity.
- forgo vs forego. The prefix fore– as in forehead, forewarn, forefront means, as you'd expect, 'before' in some sense: early or frontward. The prefix for– as in forget, forsake, forlorn means 'away' or 'without'. (One exception to the spelling rule is forward.) To forgo something is to do without it; the word forego is used most often in foregoing meaning 'what has already been said', and in the fixed idiom foregone conclusion meaning something that has effectively been decided in advance.
See my page on Commons.
made with Jenn
I'm sometimes surprised at what gets noticed. Such is the reward of the Sloth!
|The Goat Star|
|For contributions to Caprinae Solidarius ()
Lance Corporal William Windsor salutes you!
|The Mullet Pierced|
|Truly miscellanous, contributions to lots of pages, helping others with this regard, doing leg work. (About time.)- Jarry1250 [ humourous – discuss ] 10:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)|
|The Copyeditor's Barnstar|
|For cleaning up after me at Papal conclave. () KTC (talk) 05:28, 29 June 2012 (UTC)|
|The Barnstar of Diligence|
|For all your edits to Poland–Russia border. Legolover26 (talk) 15:58, 20 September 2012 (UTC)|
|The Copyeditor's Barnstar|
|Thanks for copy-editing work here Tito Dutta (talk) 08:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)|