User talk:Cloudz679

My TalkPage

Re: Error at afd?

Thanks for letting me know. It looks like I acciendently missed the word not. In any case, no harm done. Cheers and happy new year. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:47, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

RE: Edit Summary

Hey, thanks for the tip! And I didnt know that there were an option on Preferences that prompts me when I forgot that I did not put a summary.. again, THanks for the tip! GNozaki (talk) 17:20, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Don't Delete FC Seoul transfers list

Individual clubs transfer list is also notable. Not notable is just Cloudz679's opinion. I don' understant why do you delet detailed article? Transfer list By nation or Transfer list By club are both informative. As yo u Know I invest much time to write this article. But you want to delete by just your private opinion. private opionion was just 3-4 lines to write 1-2 minites. I really have spectisism on wikipedia. I crated andm improve this article 3 years. But this article can delete by just 2 person's private opinion to write 2 minites. In this manner Who contribute articles on wikepdia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Footwiks (talk • contribs) 03:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

This infomation already exists at 2013 FC Seoul season and similar articles and is not being discussed for deletion. You should know, because you put it there. No information will be deleted, only the excessive stats listing, which is against the policies. C679 08:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

I will delete transfer list on 2013 FC Seoul season. Is it ok? I have a questiton. If club transfer list are exist, What happen to you? Do you lost your job? Are you wekipedia employee? Please take it easy. This transfer list exist for 3years over.Footwiks (talk)

Per convention, information at club season articles should be kept and lists of club-specific transfers should not. What difference does it make to you if the transfer page is deleted, since the information is not going to be lost? C679 11:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

If you delete, systematic transfer list information regading FC Seoul will lost, Many people don't find easily tansfer list on season page. Footwiks (talk) 03:35, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

It works for every other club on Wikipedia, don't worry! C679 06:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Lesinari

Hi! With what reason and with what right do you decide that the page should be deleted? I gave arguments.--Nado158 (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

But brother, i do not understand why do you proposed that the side be deleted?I whish only to understand. Thanks--Nado158 (talk) 11:56, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Rakhine United

I'll have a go later. Giant Snowman 09:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

How's that? Giant Snowman 09:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Football assessment

Hi, I'm fully aware of importance, but I view a player who has made only a handful of int'l appearances, for a smaller nation, as 'low' importance. Giant Snowman 11:35, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

It's ridiculously subjective. How does one objectively define a "team with nationwide notability"? A "world-class player"? Giant Snowman 11:53, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I think it works, and is useful - but needs more flexibility. Giant Snowman 12:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I have a questions

I have a question. Why do you stalk FC Seoul articles or Non English country's Football stuff? Because of you, Many South korean football articles which I created are deleted.

If this football club pages are exist on wikipedia, Do you lost your job or wikipedia go broke beacuse of excessive server traffic? Anything is not happen. If you deleted articles, Do you recieve money from wikipedia?

I give a good information. There are many not notable articles about American football. As you know, America football only popular in America. But why English wiki user admit them and only attack Non English country's articls? If you serch this category, you can find many not notable american football team. Also contents are very few. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Defunct_American_football_teams Please should be fair to all country's articles.

If you set a deletion tag on article, Non English country's User can't win deletion debate. Because Mother tongue is not English and few user.

Please take it easy. Remain them and many people will improve this articel. If not, then delete

Becasue of you, I can't created article on English wikipedia, I investe much time to create them. Put yourself in my case, You created and edited article that you invested private time, You don't receive any money, just delevery information to user. If you, Do you have a feeling to contribute on wikepedia? Footwiks (talk) 09:59, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

See WP:EFFORT. The fact of the effort put into an article does not excuse the article from the requirements of policy and guidelines. It's a good idea to find a notable topic and then write about it. I don't know anything about the American football articles, I do not edit them. Maybe that message was intended for another user. C679 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Don't spoil FC Seoul articles

Don't spoil FC articles. Updating of FC Seoul official website is not speedy. New player prophiles are now preparing. You can't read korean newspaper or know circumstances, Please belive korean people, Korean people is not idiot. We'll editing accutely soon, New players are definately joined. Just Official website updating issue. Because of you, Editing is more confused. Please keep it. I'll keep on eye FC Seoul article. Don't worry and I think you are busy person. You have to patrol all wikipedia articles to find not notable article and delete them. Mind your business. Footwiks (talk)

As I told you before, I suggest you create it at the Korean wikipedia first, where you can develop it, then later on translate it into English. Pages can be deleted for many reasons, none of which have anything to do with being Korean. C679 14:47, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

RSSSF Feedback

Hi Cloudz

We all seem to drift back after a break. League321 was first conceived a few months ago as a Wikipedia essay that quickly outgrew itself. Hopefully it will now develop into a prime resource for Wikipedia Football and the RSSSF "stats family" but the unknown factor is whether this type of Web 1.00 site is of any interest to the wider football community. Time will tell. It is a huge project.

The more I look at the different sources for league tables and the small variations that arise, the more I doubt general accuracy. We tend to treat RSSSF as "the bible" but the bottom line is that they are equally dependent on the diligence in evidence gathering of their individual RSSSF editors. RSSSF does list the email addresses of their editors and a good starting point would be to contact the appropriate editor where errors may have arisen. If he is no longer active then obviously contact the main RSSSF editor.

Enjoy your football. Kind regards. League Octopus (League Octopus 09:35, 1 February 2013 (UTC))

Asmir Begović

Hi, I've merged the two pages, full history can be found at Asmir Begović. Giant Snowman 20:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

The joys of collaborative editing! Giant Snowman 20:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Fellsburg, Pennsylvania

Hello, I fixed the references that you said in the above said article. Is this what you were meaning? Thanks for the input βrỴḇṛỹ1999 (talk) 18:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Theodor Gebre Selassie

I see you removed references from Theodor Gebre Selassie with this edit, citing wp:noneng. There is nothing at noneng about deleting foreign-language sources, and as a Czech man it is quite rationale that some of the references at his page be in the Czech language. Also the fact supported by this citation is quite notable, so I have restored it. Thanks, C679 10:22, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. WP:NONENG stipulates that "because this is the English Wikipedia, English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones." In the event that they are included, "translations published by reliable sources are preferred over translations by Wikipedians." The edit was neither. I've therefore replaced it with an English language source. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 15:26, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

The policy doesn't provide for deleting such foreign-language sources though. Expected the replacement though, which I agree is the right way to go ahead on this occasion. I hope you won't delete Czech-language sources from the page in the future on the basis that they're not English, as there is a significant amount about him which has been reported that is not available in English-language sources. C679 18:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Only if it's a WP:REDFLAG issue. Otherwise, Czech-language sources are alright I guess, though English-language sources are still preferred overall per non-eng. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 18:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Good to know, as his is one of the Czech football biographies I have identified for improvement. His main "red flag" seems to have now been supported by English-language sources, I will add a couple more for good measure and continue with the development later in the year. Thank you for your input. C679 18:29, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Not sure what the apparently Czech-only information on him is, but the policies above should cover them. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 18:38, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Manually closing FLCs

Hello, and thanks for noticing that this was a bit of a mess. At the moment, the bot isn't running, so they are being closed manually, see WT:FLC#Nominations not closing?. Think the person doing them hasn't quite got used to it yet..... I've left them a note. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Wasn't sure quite what had happened, hope it works out and btw congrats on the FLC. Good stuff. Thanks, C679 09:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

PROD notification

Thanks for putting the notification in its right place, I'm not very familiar with en.wp's procedures so I followed the standards for it.wp (my home wiki). I hope I didn't cause too much of a nuisance. Bye --Cruccone (talk) 11:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with Jack Stefanowski

Thank you for your help fixing the citations with Jack Stefanowski - and for the tip. Libby norman 19:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Taiwan

Hi, I've removed Taiwan from the template, but have no idea about bots I'm afraid (though I do intend to do so one day!), you'd be best trying at WP:BOTREQ. Regards, Giant Snowman 21:35, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Shirak F.C.

Full history is at Shirak F.C., purely because that is the 'original' title - no opinion on which is the 'corrct' name. Giant Snowman 19:29, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: Talk page banners

Will do. Cheers for the notice. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 09:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Re: u20 African stubs

I've already PROD'ed most of the articles in that category. The deletion of these articles isn't particularly controversial. The only reason anyone would object to their deletion is if I missed some procedural point, like with Abderrahmane Saighi and Abderrahmane Bourdim, or if they don't know the notability guidelines, which means that individually each of these articles are obvious PROD's. If you ask me, whether it's just one or 130 articles, shouldn't really change anything. You're welcome to take them to afd if you think its necessary. Personally, I don't think it is. Cheers. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Eye above Prague

Hi Cloudz. The article was completely messed up. Eye above Prague (Oko nad Prahou) is a documentary film about the Kaplický's project. Both the project and the film are notable, there has been huge public discussion in the Czech Republic about it [1]. The project is covered on cs:wiki under the title Národní knihovna na Letné. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 11:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

According to the article that was there, it was about a proposed new library. If there is a notable film and project about it, I'm sure it will be easy to create a stub with some good sourcing. Thanks, C679 13:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

The article claimed that Eye above Prague is the project of a new Czech national library building (designed by Kaplický). No, it is a documentary film made about the project and controversies surrounding it. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 08:14, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Well something like G4 isn't applicable as it wasn't deleted at AfD nor is it similar, so if you have enough information, feel free to re-create. C679 09:52, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

It would be definitely better to start from scratch - it was a total mess. I just thought I should let you know as you wrote: "Proposed project which was not realised. Lack of WP:SIGCOV" in your deletion nom. The project is notable and important, even if not realised. It was one of the main topics of discussion in the Czech media and society several years ago. Take care :) --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 10:19, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Sounds like starting from scratch is best, I look forward to seeing it on English Wiki one day :) C679 10:22, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Soccerbase errors

Hello. There are many, sadly, and probably many more than have notes against them. Cameron Jerome#Notes, or Damien Johnson#Notes, but those just refer to the infobox, as does Rashid Yussuff, which is a recent one. John Nutter, which isn't one of mine. Can't remember any that were discussed at WT:FOOTY, but then I can't remember my mobile phone number most of the time, so it doesn't prove much. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright issues: Czech Republic–Iceland relations

Thank you for letting me know. I have removed the content again, as it contains content from [2] published without documentation of compatible license. We are not able to duplicate content or closely paraphrase it from external sources except in compliance with WP:C and WP:NFC. You are very welcome to rewrite this material in your own words, but please do not restore the previously existing text unless you can verify that the source is free for such use as it is substantially similar to the source in language and structure. For one example:

Source	Article
In April 1999, there was an official visit of the Czech President Václav Havel to Iceland and several working meetings with the Icelandic President Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson ....	In 1999 there was an official visit of the Czech President Václav Havel to Iceland and several working meetings with the Icelandic President Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson...

--Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Andysteve

Thanks, I'll take a look. Giant Snowman 17:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Translation template

Yeap [3]. Thanks.—Nuno93 (talk) 06:20, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

‎NFT player

I hope you don't think you were ignored; us Admins are a busy lot and I personally just don't have the technical skills to deal with templates of that nature. Your best bet with these kind of Admin requests is to ask an Admin personally, maybe try Thumperward for templates? Giant Snowman 13:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Martin Slavík

Hi, I don't think I can HISTMERGE as the histories are parallel so I have simply redirected one to the other, hope that's OK. Giant Snowman 10:58, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

please do not deleate bob ricca

I have forgotten where i got the info from but please dont delete it thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Worldwidesunshine (talk • contribs) 22:13, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

	HPTS - Area Progetti - Edu-Soft - JavaEdu - N.Saperi - Ass.Scuola.. - TS BCTV - TSODP - TRTWE

	TSE-Wiki - Blog Lavoro - InterAzioni- NormaScuola - Editoriali - Job Search - DownFree !