I'm a bit concerned that the HB "History" section is more like a "History of the Standard Model". Not a surprise, as the history of the Higgs boson (and electroweak theory, Higgs mechanism etc) to a great extent is the history of the Standard Model or greatly overlaps it.
To fix this, much like the "search" section, a lot of this ought to be moved off to an article History of the Standard Model and summarized here. We have "history of..." articles for many aspects of physics but not for the SM itself. If we had such an article then this section could be (rightly) cut down a lot.
I've made a start at working on such an article here if interested and would like to ask for your help to keep an eye on it and suggest when it's at least capable of going mainspace. That way we can cut down the HB article history and link to that (new) article for the detail which would be good.
If I've made a mistake, I'm certainly willing to rectify it. There's no need to resort to childish name calling. Cheers. Kaldari (talk) 01:01, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Just an objective observation.TR 21:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
That's a mature response. Kaldari (talk) 08:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
If you do something stupid, you should not be surprised to be called out on it, especially if you failed to follow common courtesy in doing so.TR 09:31, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Yes, it was a foolish action done without proper research and consideration. I apologize for the mistake. Kaldari (talk) 11:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Black hole (estimated annual readership: 1,725,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:
If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
If I've missed any others, just let me know... and thanks again for serving so many readers with your work. Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:31, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Article on Basil Hiley
Some time ago in June 2011 you rated the article on "Basil Hiley" as "Low importance" (diff link). Since that time, Hiley has received the Majorana prize (in 2012), and the Wikipedia article about him has changed substantially, having been expanded and improved. I noted that you are member of the WikiProject Physics – would you be willing to consider whether it would merit to be upgraded to C- or B-class on quality and to "mid" on importance?
If you feel that the criteria for mid importance are met, feel free to change the importance rating. There is no monopoly on changing this rating by anyone, so go ahead. TR 11:52, 16 December 2013 (UTC)