Wikipedia:Proposed mergers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Closing instructions

Shortcuts:

The discussion about merging at the village pump is now archived (here). The vast majority of those who expressed an opinion considered the system based on the current templates and this process (Wikipedia:Proposed mergers) to be inadequate.

The implementation of a new automated system is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Merge#Automation of merge proposals. More participation in that discussion is welcome.

This page lists proposed article mergers as a supplement to the merge categories and templates; it does not replace any of the other steps in the merger process. Please add the appropriate merger tag(s) to the articles before listing them here.

Category mergers should not be proposed here. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.

Template mergers should not be proposed here. Please see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion.

Contents

How to propose a merger

Proposing a merger can be done in three steps:

  1. Create a place for discussion. Go to the discussion page (also known as the talk page) of the target (merging to) article and create a section to discuss the merger. If there's already a discussion on the talk page regarding the merger, you can omit this step. Whether the discussion is new or old, make sure the discussion section names all articles involved and link to them. The section name can be anything that includes the word merge, for example ==Proposed merger from Page1==.
  2. Put one of the merger tags at the top of the articles you wish to be merged. The templates {{merge}}, {{Merge from}} and {{Merge to}} are the most common ones. Remember to make sure that the Discuss link in each tag points to the section you've created in step 1 – this is to prevent having two separate discussions on different talk pages.
  3. If the proposed merge is controversial or potentially difficult to carry out, follow the directions under #Requests for assistance and feedback to add it to the list.

Requests for assistance and feedback

If you need outside feedback regarding mergers that are either tricky or of a controversial nature, please do the following:

  • Tag the article as shown above
  • Create a discussion as shown above
  • Notify the talk page of the appropriate Wikiproject to get knowledgable people to comment on it.
  • If there is consensus to merge, but the merge is difficult, contact Wikipedia:WikiProject Merge for assistance.

For other topics:

Don't post here if you are not willing to do the merge yourself. We will provide you assistance in how to complete the merge if you are unsure how to do it.

Current requests

If you need assistance with proposing a merge, list it below and someone will make sure it's properly listed. Note that this will not get the merge completed, as there is a large merge backlog. This can also be used if an old proposal needs more discussion. We will attempt to get more people to comment on it.

Once a merge is listed properly, move it to the completed requests or awaiting consensus sections below as appropriate.

Please list new requests at the bottom of this section. Use the edit summary–List at least one of the articles' titles. Please sign each listing or comment by typing: ~~~~

  • Ditto: my first merge proposal. I think I tagged it right (followed WP:Merge) but would just like to have someone experienced look it over. Merge Beyond Ex-Gay into Ex-ex-gay. I also plan to check History and notify prominent past editors (if any) on their Talk pages, but other than that, I'm done I think. Feedback (if needed) to my Talk page, thanks! Mathglot (talk) 21:11, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Hans Hopfen and Hans von Hopfen are two articles about the same person and content on exactly the same topic. So, I believe they should be merged. I've put the templates described in WP:Merge, but, as I'm not contributor of the English Wikipedia I don't think I will be able to follow this proposal. can someone takes care about it, please? Tpt (talk) 09:35, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
  • I found it uncomfortable to have both articles Southern Pacific class GS-6 and Southern Pacific 4460 existing. Probably, it's best to move the latter to the former. The articles are too simililar, and I also want to see original and uncited content to be handled (the nicknames, for example). Ctempire (talk) 21:21, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


Awaiting consensus

Seems a straightforward merge is in order into the "History" section of United Continental Holdings. Same company, different name now. Go ahead. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Merge and Redirect were reversed. Need further input for consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:17, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Consensus seems to be is to "Merge". Someone familiar with the subject should do so. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
  • articles have been tagged and are awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed that the Awake (TV series) character articles be merged together to a character list article or main article:

The discussion is >>>here<<< 65.94.76.126 (talk) 00:03, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

(talk) 20:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


Completed requests

YesY Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 04:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Archives

Tagged articles

See also