Disputatio Usoris:UV

E Vicipaedia
Salire ad: navigationem, quaerere

Vide etiam disputationes annorum 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 et 2013.

Happy New Year and ...recensere | fontem recensere

... I just wonder if you can help at Disputatio Formulae:Cite web, UV? Andrew Dalby 15:15, 3 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)

Happy New year to you as well! I gave the citation templates a try. Greetings, --UV (disputatio) 20:28, 4 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)

Francus Trappolirecensere | fontem recensere

Vale, carissime UV, quomodo te habes?

Haec pagina creavi et tibi peto prvam relecturam, parvum labor erit! Tibi grazias ago.

Rei Momo (disputatio) 11:50, 12 Februarii 2014 (UTC)

Legi. Vale! --UV (disputatio) 23:15, 12 Februarii 2014 (UTC)
Tibi gratias ago! Rei Momo (disputatio) 07:45, 13 Februarii 2014 (UTC)

Cur haec revertio?recensere | fontem recensere

Vide: [1] --Ben4Wiki (disputatio) 15:32, 21 Februarii 2014 (UTC)

Ego eodem tempore in paginam usoris Ben4Wiki explicavi. Andrew Dalby 15:38, 21 Februarii 2014 (UTC)

Can you help?recensere | fontem recensere

UV, I have no idea where to report this. An anonymous IP 126.86.167.155 has been slowly doing some cross-wiki vandalism: an illustration of an organ (I mean, a musical organ!) has been inserted on lots of pages, across many wikipedias, where it didn't belong, especially pages about guitarists and about manga. It's surprising that they haven't been noticed: some of the pages have been like that for months and have been edited meanwhile. Just shows how easy it is. It happened here today at Gary Moore, that's why I noticed.

I think I have corrected the pages affected (though there might be others in which a different image has been used) but the address should be blocked, I think. Can you pass the message on, by any chance? Andrew Dalby 13:24, 8 Martii 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for spotting this! I have now reported this issue at meta:Vandalism reports#126.86.167.155. Greetings, --UV (disputatio) 22:27, 8 Martii 2014 (UTC)

ToCrecensere | fontem recensere

I understand your thinking, but, believe it or not, Iacobus and I are at one on this. I also find the table of contents a pure nuisance (maybe more useful on en:wiki, where there are many very long pages). So I abrogated your last change at my common.css. Best wishes -- Andrew Dalby 09:17, 3 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)

Fine! (I thought you probably just wanted to help testing when you added this to your common.css, now I know better …) Greetings, --UV (disputatio) 21:58, 3 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)

Nizus Netorecensere | fontem recensere

Vale, carissime UV, quomodo te habes?

Haec nova pagina nunc feci, et tibi peto 5 minutos ut parvam relecturam dare. Tibi gratias ago! Rei Momo (disputatio) 21:02, 15 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)








Creative Commons License